I'm moving Laputan Logic over to a new completely dog-food-compliant website which is located at www.laputanlogic.com. All updates will occur there for now on, so please update your bookmarks and if you have one of those websites that is kind enough to link to me, please update your blogroll as well.
I must say I'm pretty happy with the new format which I hope will enable me to update more frequently but at the same time keep the stuff I have spent more time working on from being pushed too far down the page. I must confess I have been struggling to find the right mix with the blog format. I think this should be a major improvement and I hope you will like it as well.
Here's a sample of why you should be heading there RIGHT NOW:
In 550 AD, during the reign of Emperor Justinian, a monk who was cloistered at a remote monastery in the Sinai
desert wrote a curious book about the topology of the earth and the
universe. In the book the monk, who is know to posterity as Cosmas
Indicopleustes, propounded a surprising theory that the
world was not
spherical
as believed by the ancients but, on the contrary, was flat and surrounded by
four
walls which stretched up to the heavens and formed a curved lid.
Scholarship has not been terribly kind to the work of Cosmas
Indicopleustes. Even in his own time he had to staunchly defend his
theory
against strong criticism. By his own admission he was not well
educated in the "learning of schools" and his unfortunate practice of
distorting passages of
scripture in order to support his argument led to his work being
largely dismissed by his contemporaries and then
disregarded by later generations. While we too can easily dismiss
his eccentric notions which seem to be more the product of pious
daydreaming than any kind of scientific investigation or empirical observation,
on closer inspection there is another rather more interesting side to Cosmas.
Thirty years before writing his book, Cosmas had led a life very
different from the serene austerity of a desert cloister. Cosmas
Indicopleustes actually means "Cosmas the India Voyager" and back then the monk was a merchant
who had traveled extensively around the coasts
of the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. Buried
deep under ten volumes of questionable scholarship which
comprises the bulk of his Topology we find a surprising and
particularly
lucid account of his travels to these countries. This
eleventh volume
bears little relationship to the
earlier parts of the book and it is thought to have been excerpted from
another larger work
of his on geography which has, sadly, been lost.
While its known that the Roman
world engaged in
trade with the Indian subcontinent,
Cosmas offers us one of the only
authentic eyewitness accounts. A close reading indicates that he had
considerable local knowledge of the regions he describes and there
is little doubt that he actually visited these places rather than
merely
relating second-hand information.
He begins his geographical treatise by describing the unusual flora and fauna of
Africa and Asia. Here are some excerpts:
Rhinoceros
This animal is called the rhinoceros from having horns upon his snout. When he is walking his horns are mobile, but when he sees anything to move his rage, he erects them and they become so rigid that they are strong enough to tear up even trees by the root, those especially which come right before him. His eyes are placed low down near his jaws. He is altogether a fearful animal, and he is somehow hostile to the elephant. His feet and his skin, however, closely resemble those of the elephant. His skin, when dried, is four fingers thick, and this some people put, instead of iron, in the plough, and with it plough the land.
The Ethiopians in their own dialect call the rhinoceros Arou, or Harisi, aspirating the alpha of the latter word, and adding risi. By the arou they designate the beast as such, and by arisi, ploughing, giving him this name from his shape about the nostrils, and also from the use to which his hide is turned. In Ethiopia I once saw a live rhinoceros while I was standing at a far distance, and I saw also the skin of a dead one stuffed with chaff, standing in the royal palace, and so I have been able to draw him accurately.
The accuracy of Cosmas' drawing of the rhinoceros leaves a fair bit to be desired but apparently the word arou that he gives as the name of the two-horned rhinoceros is still used in Ethiopia to this day.